How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?
Costedoat, Sébastien | Corbera, Esteve [autor/a] | Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss [autor/a] | Honey Rosés, Jordi [autor/a] | Baylis, Kathy [autor/a] | Castillo Santiago, Miguel Ángel [autor/a].
Tipo de material: Artículo en línea Tema(s): Pago por servicios ecosistémicos | Conservación de la diversidad biológica | Deforestación | Conservación de bosquesTema(s) en inglés: Payments for ecosystem services | Biological diversity conservation | Deforestation | Forest conservationDescriptor(es) geográficos: Marqués de Comillas (Chiapas, México) | Benemérito de Las Américas (Chiapas, México) Nota de acceso: Acceso en línea sin restricciones En: Plos One. volumen 10, número 3 e0119881 (March 2015), páginas 65-78. --ISSN: 1932-6203Número de sistema: 6696Recurso en línea: http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0119881&representation=PDFTipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Colección | Signatura | Estado | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | Biblioteca Electrónica Recursos en línea (RE) | ECOSUR | Recurso digital | ECO400066962622 |
Acceso en línea sin restricciones
We assess the additional forest cover protected by 13 rural communities located in the southern state of Chiapas, Mexico, as a result of the economic incentives received through the country's national program of payments for biodiversity conservation. We use spatially explicit data at the intra-community level to define a credible counterfactual of conservation outcomes. We use covariate-matching specifications associated with spatially explicit variables and difference-in-difference estimators to determine the treatment effect. We estimate that the additional conservation represents between 12 and 14.7 percent of forest area enrolled in the program in comparison to control areas. Despite this high degree of additionality, we also observe lack of compliance in some plots participating in the PES program. This lack of compliance casts doubt on the ability of payments alone to guarantee long-term additionality in context of high deforestation rates, even with an augmented program budget or extension of participation to communities not yet enrolled.
Disponible en línea
Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior