Vista normal Vista MARC

Biodiversity estimates and ecological interpretations of meiofaunal communities are biased by the taxonomic approach

Leasi, Francesca [autora] | Sevigny, Joseph L [autor] | Laflamme, Eric M [autor] | Artois, Tom [autor] | Curini Galletti, Marco [autor] | De Jesús Navarrete, Alberto [autor] | Domenico, Maikon Di [autor] | Goetz, Freya [autora] | Hal, Jeffrey A [autor] | Hochberg, Rick [autor] | Jörger, Katharina M [autora] | Jondelius, Ulf [autor] | Todaro, M. Antonio [autor] | Wirshing, Herman H [autor] | Norenburg, Jon L [autor] | Thomas, W. Kelley [autora].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 en línea Artículo en línea Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Meiofauna | Anatomía comparada | Filogenética | Factores ambientalesTema(s) en inglés: Meiofauna | Anatomy, comparative | Phylogenetics | Environmental factorsDescriptor(es) geográficos: Panamá Nota de acceso: Acceso en línea sin restricciones En: Communications Biology. Volumen 1, número 112 (December 2018), páginas 1-12Número de sistema: 59778Resumen:
Inglés

Accurate assessments of biodiversity are crucial to advising ecosystem-monitoring programs and understanding ecosystem function. Nevertheless, a standard operating procedure to assess biodiversity accurately and consistently has not been established. This is especially true for meiofauna, a diverse community (>20 phyla) of small benthic invertebrates that have fundamental ecological roles. Recent studies show that metabarcoding is a cost-effective and time-effective method to estimate meiofauna biodiversity, in contrast to morphological-based taxonomy. Here, we compare biodiversity assessments of a diverse meiofaunal community derived by applying multiple taxonomic methods based on comparative morphology, molecular phylogenetic analysis, DNA barcoding of individual specimens, and metabarcoding of environmental DNA. We show that biodiversity estimates are strongly biased across taxonomic methods and phyla. Such biases affect understanding of community structures and ecological interpretations. This study supports the urgency of improving aspects of environmental high-throughput sequencing and the value of taxonomists in correctly understanding biodiversity estimates.

Recurso en línea: https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-018-0119-2
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400597783499

Acceso en línea sin restricciones

Accurate assessments of biodiversity are crucial to advising ecosystem-monitoring programs and understanding ecosystem function. Nevertheless, a standard operating procedure to assess biodiversity accurately and consistently has not been established. This is especially true for meiofauna, a diverse community (>20 phyla) of small benthic invertebrates that have fundamental ecological roles. Recent studies show that metabarcoding is a cost-effective and time-effective method to estimate meiofauna biodiversity, in contrast to morphological-based taxonomy. Here, we compare biodiversity assessments of a diverse meiofaunal community derived by applying multiple taxonomic methods based on comparative morphology, molecular phylogenetic analysis, DNA barcoding of individual specimens, and metabarcoding of environmental DNA. We show that biodiversity estimates are strongly biased across taxonomic methods and phyla. Such biases affect understanding of community structures and ecological interpretations. This study supports the urgency of improving aspects of environmental high-throughput sequencing and the value of taxonomists in correctly understanding biodiversity estimates. eng

Con tecnología Koha