Vista normal Vista MARC

A comparison between the recombinant expression and chemical synthesis of a short cysteine-rich insecticidal spider peptide

Clement, Herlinda | Flores, Vianey [autor/a] | Diego García, Elia [autor/a] | Corrales Garcia, Ligia [autor/a] | Villegas, Elba [autor/a] | Corzo, Gerardo [autor/a].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 en línea Artículo en línea Tema(s): Péptidos | Insecticidas | Brachypelma albiceps | Arañas | Síntesis químicaTema(s) en inglés: Peptides | Insecticides | Brachypelma albiceps | Spiders | Chemical synthesisNota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso En: Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases. volumen 21, número 19 (2015), páginas 1-10. --ISSN: 1678-9199Número de sistema: 59733Resumen:
Inglés

Abstract Background: The choice between heterologous expression versus chemical synthesis for synthesizing short cysteine-rich insecticidal peptides from arthropods may impact the obtainment of yields and well-folded bioactive molecules for scientific research. Therefore, two recombinant expression systems were compared to that of chemical synthesis for producing Ba1, a cysteine-rich spider neurotoxin. Methods: The transcription of the insecticidal neurotoxin Ba1 was obtained from a cDNA library of venom glands of the spider Brachypelma albiceps. It was cloned into the pCR®2.1-TOPO® cloning vector and then introduced in two different expression vectors, pQE40 and pET28a+. Each vector was transfected into E. coli M15 and BL21 cells, respectively, and expressed under induction with isopropyl thiogalactoside (IPTG). The chemical synthesis of Ba1 was performed in an Applied Biosystems 433A peptide synthesizer.

Results: Both expression systems pQE40 and pET28a+ expressed the His-tagged recombinant protein products, HisrDFHRBa1 and HisrBa1, respectively, as inclusion bodies. The recombinant proteins HisrDFHRBa1 and HisrBa1 presented respective molecular masses of 28,289 and 8274.6 Da, and were not biologically active. These results suggested that both HisrDFHRBa1 and HisrBa1 were oxidized after cell extraction, and that their insecticidal activities were affected by their N-terminal pro-peptides and different disulfide bridge arrangements. The respective protein expression yields for HisrDFHRBa1 and HisrBa1 were 100 μg/L and 900μg/L of culture medium. HisrBa1 was reducedand folded under in vitro conditions. Thein vitrofolding of HisrBa1 produced several isoforms, one of which, afterremoving its N-terminal pro-peptide by enzymatic cleavage, presented elevated insecticidal activities compared to the native Ba1. Furthermore, the His-tagged protein HisrDFHRBa1 underwent enzymatic cleavage to obtain recombinantBa1 (rBa1). As expected, the molecular mass of rBa1 was 4406.4 Da. On the other hand, Ba1 was chemically synthesized(sBa1) with a yield of 11 mg per 0.1 mmol of amino acid assembly. Conclusions: The two recombinant insecticidal peptides and the one synthesized chemically were as active as thenative Ba1; however, toxin yields differed drastically.

Recurso en línea: http://sii.ecosur.mx/Content/ProductosActividades/archivos/32243/textocompleto.pdf
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400597334917

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

Abstract Background: The choice between heterologous expression versus chemical synthesis for synthesizing short cysteine-rich insecticidal peptides from arthropods may impact the obtainment of yields and well-folded bioactive molecules for scientific research. Therefore, two recombinant expression systems were compared to that of chemical synthesis for producing Ba1, a cysteine-rich spider neurotoxin. Methods: The transcription of the insecticidal neurotoxin Ba1 was obtained from a cDNA library of venom glands of the spider Brachypelma albiceps. It was cloned into the pCR®2.1-TOPO® cloning vector and then introduced in two different expression vectors, pQE40 and pET28a+. Each vector was transfected into E. coli M15 and BL21 cells, respectively, and expressed under induction with isopropyl thiogalactoside (IPTG). The chemical synthesis of Ba1 was performed in an Applied Biosystems 433A peptide synthesizer. eng

Results: Both expression systems pQE40 and pET28a+ expressed the His-tagged recombinant protein products, HisrDFHRBa1 and HisrBa1, respectively, as inclusion bodies. The recombinant proteins HisrDFHRBa1 and HisrBa1 presented respective molecular masses of 28,289 and 8274.6 Da, and were not biologically active. These results suggested that both HisrDFHRBa1 and HisrBa1 were oxidized after cell extraction, and that their insecticidal activities were affected by their N-terminal pro-peptides and different disulfide bridge arrangements. The respective protein expression yields for HisrDFHRBa1 and HisrBa1 were 100 μg/L and 900μg/L of culture medium. HisrBa1 was reducedand folded under in vitro conditions. Thein vitrofolding of HisrBa1 produced several isoforms, one of which, afterremoving its N-terminal pro-peptide by enzymatic cleavage, presented elevated insecticidal activities compared to the native Ba1. Furthermore, the His-tagged protein HisrDFHRBa1 underwent enzymatic cleavage to obtain recombinantBa1 (rBa1). As expected, the molecular mass of rBa1 was 4406.4 Da. On the other hand, Ba1 was chemically synthesized(sBa1) with a yield of 11 mg per 0.1 mmol of amino acid assembly. Conclusions: The two recombinant insecticidal peptides and the one synthesized chemically were as active as thenative Ba1; however, toxin yields differed drastically. eng

Disponible en línea

Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior

Haga clic en una imagen para verla en el visor de imágenes

Con tecnología Koha