Vista normal Vista MARC

Ocean wave modeling [Libro electrónico] / the SWAMP Group

Por: Group, the SWAMP [autor/a].
Tipo de material: Libro en línea Libro en línea Editor: New York, New York, United States: Plenum Press, c1985Descripción: vi, 256 páginas : ilustraciones ; 24 centímetros.ISBN: 0306416859; 9781475760576 (Print); 9781475760552 (Online).Tema(s): Ocean waves -- Simulation methods | Sea Wave Modeling ProjectNota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso Nota de bibliografía: Incluye bibliografía e índice: páginas 253-256 Número de sistema: 55571Contenidos:Mostrar Resumen:
Inglés

Early in 1979, a group of wave researchers proposed a wave model inter­ comparison study to clarify the interrelations existing among the various wave models which have been developed in past years for real-time wave forecasting, wave statistics compilations, or hindcast case studies. The idea was immediately welcomed by the wave modeling community, and, finally, nine wave modeling groups from the United States, Japan, and Europe participated in the exercise. The principal results of this work are presented here jointly by the Sea Wave Modeling Project (swAMP) Group (the members of which are listed in Appendix A). Descriptions of the models used in the study are given in Part II of this volume. A more complete documentation of the entire set of numerical experiments is given in Part 2 of the Sea Wave Modeling Project (SWAMP group, 1982). The main purpose of the intercomparison study was to test our present understanding of the physics of . wind-generated surface waves from the viewpoint of wave modeling. Specifically, we wished to clarify the basic interdependence between understanding the physics of surface waves, repre­ senting the physics numerically, and predicting quantitatively the detailed space-time evolution of a two-dimensional surface wave spectrum for a given wind field. It was not our intent to carry out a model competition. In this sense there were no winners or losers: all models could claim specific strong points, and all displayed weaknesses in some areas.

Recurso en línea: http://link.springer.com/openurl?genre=book&isbn=978-1-4757-6057-6
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Libros Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE) 		Acervo General Recurso digital ECO400555713851

Incluye bibliografía e índice: páginas 253-256

Chapter 1. The sea wave modeling project (SWAMP: principal results and conclusions.. Chapter 2. The SWAMP models.. Index

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

Early in 1979, a group of wave researchers proposed a wave model inter­ comparison study to clarify the interrelations existing among the various wave models which have been developed in past years for real-time wave forecasting, wave statistics compilations, or hindcast case studies. The idea was immediately welcomed by the wave modeling community, and, finally, nine wave modeling groups from the United States, Japan, and Europe participated in the exercise. The principal results of this work are presented here jointly by the Sea Wave Modeling Project (swAMP) Group (the members of which are listed in Appendix A). Descriptions of the models used in the study are given in Part II of this volume. A more complete documentation of the entire set of numerical experiments is given in Part 2 of the Sea Wave Modeling Project (SWAMP group, 1982). The main purpose of the intercomparison study was to test our present understanding of the physics of . wind-generated surface waves from the viewpoint of wave modeling. Specifically, we wished to clarify the basic interdependence between understanding the physics of surface waves, repre­ senting the physics numerically, and predicting quantitatively the detailed space-time evolution of a two-dimensional surface wave spectrum for a given wind field. It was not our intent to carry out a model competition. In this sense there were no winners or losers: all models could claim specific strong points, and all displayed weaknesses in some areas. eng

Disponible en línea

Disponible en formato PDF

Subscripción a ELSEVIER 26 de diciembre del 2013

Con tecnología Koha