Vista normal Vista MARC

Design review: challenging urban aesthetic control [Libro electrónico] / edited by Brenda Case Scheer, Wolfgang F. E. Preiser

Scheer, Brenda Case [editor] | Preiser, Wolfgang F. E [editor/a].
Tipo de material: Libro
 en línea Libro en línea Editor: New York, New York, United States: Chapman & Hall, c1994Descripción: xxi, 219 páginas : ilustraciones mapas ; 26 centímetros.ISBN: 0412983516; 0412991616; 9780412991615 (Print); 9781461526582 (Online).Tema(s): Architectural design -- Standards | City planningNota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso Nota de bibliografía: Incluye bibliografía e índice: páginas 213-219 Número de sistema: 55320Contenidos:Mostrar Resumen:
Inglés

That the topic ofdesign review is somehow trou­ My biases are clearfrom the start: I am among blesome is probably one thing all readers can those who believe that, despite all signals to the contrary, the physical structure of our environ­ agree on. Beyond this, however, I suspect pros­ pects of consensus are dim. Differing opinions ment can be managed, and that controlling it is on the subject likely range from those desiring the key to the ameliorationofnumerous problems control tothosedesiringfreedom. Saysonecamp: confronting society today. I believe that design our physical and natural environments are going can solve a host ofproblems, and that the design to hell in a hand basket. Says the other: design of the physical environment does influence be­ review boards are only as good as their members; havior. more often than not their interventions produce Clearly, this is a perspective that encompasses mediocre architecture. more than one building at a time and demands As a town planner and architect, I am sympa­ that each building understand its place in a larger thetic to the full range of sentiment. Perhaps a context-the city. Indeed, anyone proposing discussion of these two concepts-control and physical solutions to urban problems is designing freedom-and their differences would now be or, as may seem more often the case, destroying useful. But let me instead suggest that both posi­ the city.

Recurso en línea: http://link.springer.com/openurl?genre=book&isbn=978-0-412-99161-5
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Libros Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
Acervo General Recurso digital ECO400553202554

Incluye bibliografía e índice: páginas 213-219

Chapter 1. - Introduction: the debate on design review.. Chapter 2. - Issues in design review.. Chapter 3. - Design review in practice.. Chapter 4. - Critical perspectives of design review.. Index

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

That the topic ofdesign review is somehow trou­ My biases are clearfrom the start: I am among blesome is probably one thing all readers can those who believe that, despite all signals to the contrary, the physical structure of our environ­ agree on. Beyond this, however, I suspect pros­ pects of consensus are dim. Differing opinions ment can be managed, and that controlling it is on the subject likely range from those desiring the key to the ameliorationofnumerous problems control tothosedesiringfreedom. Saysonecamp: confronting society today. I believe that design our physical and natural environments are going can solve a host ofproblems, and that the design to hell in a hand basket. Says the other: design of the physical environment does influence be­ review boards are only as good as their members; havior. more often than not their interventions produce Clearly, this is a perspective that encompasses mediocre architecture. more than one building at a time and demands As a town planner and architect, I am sympa­ that each building understand its place in a larger thetic to the full range of sentiment. Perhaps a context-the city. Indeed, anyone proposing discussion of these two concepts-control and physical solutions to urban problems is designing freedom-and their differences would now be or, as may seem more often the case, destroying useful. But let me instead suggest that both posi­ the city. eng

Disponible en línea

Disponible en formato PDF

Subscripción a ELSEVIER 26 de diciembre del 2013

Con tecnología Koha