Vista normal Vista MARC

Application of a simulation model for assessing integration of smallholder shifting cultivation and sheep production in Yucatán, Mexico

Parsons, David [autor/a] | Nicholson, Charles F [autor/a] | Blake, Robert W [autor/a] | Ketterings, Quirine M [autor/a] | Ramírez Avilés, Luis [autor/a] | Cherney, Jerome H [autor/a] | Fox, Danny G [autor/a].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 impreso(a) 
 
  y electrónico  
  Artículo impreso(a) y electrónico Tema(s): Ovejas | Maíz | Relaciones animal-planta | Explotación agrícola en pequeña escala | Modelos de simulaciónDescriptor(es) geográficos: Yucatán (México) Nota de acceso: Acceso en línea sin restricciones En: Agricultural Systems. volumen 104, número 1 (January 2011), páginas 13-19. --ISSN: 0308-521XNúmero de sistema: 50346Resumen:
Inglés

Simulation models are effective tools to examine interactions between livestock, cropping systems, households, and natural resources. Our study objective was to use an integrated livestock and crop model to assess the outcomes from selected suites of management decisions observed in smallholder sheep-cropping systems of Yucatán, Mexico. The scenarios contrasted specialized systems versus mixed farming, and evaluated the outcomes of increased crop-livestock integration. Mixed enterprise scenarios involving sheep provided more income than specialized enterprises, and capitalized on a lower price of on-farm maize grain, efficient utilization of surplus labor, and availability of common land. Labor and management income was greatest for the unintegrated and partially integrated crop and livestock scenarios. It was more profitable for producers to sell excess grain and maize stover, and use common land to feed the livestock, suggesting that increased integration does not always result in improved outcomes. The results are consistent with a system not yet pushed to the point where integration is inevitable. For all sets of scenarios, the model structure was able to accommodate subtle management differences to produce appropriate biophysical, labor, and economic outcomes. We conclude there is potential to use similar model development methods to describe other crop-livestock systems, thus providing tools for learning, scenario analysis, and impact assessment.

Recurso en línea: http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1109&context=agb_fac&sei-redir=1#search=%22Application+of+a+simulation+model+for+assessing+of+smallholder+shifting+cultivation+and+sheep+production+in+Yucat%C3%83%C2%A1n,+M%C3%83%C2%A9xico%22
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Info Vol Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
FROSUR Recurso digital ECO400503465782
Artículos Biblioteca San Cristóbal

Texto en la configuración de la biblioteca San Cristóbal

Artículos Yucatán Hemeroteca (AR Y H)
FROSUR 001 Disponible 460509C50438-10

Acceso en línea sin restricciones

Simulation models are effective tools to examine interactions between livestock, cropping systems, households, and natural resources. Our study objective was to use an integrated livestock and crop model to assess the outcomes from selected suites of management decisions observed in smallholder sheep-cropping systems of Yucatán, Mexico. The scenarios contrasted specialized systems versus mixed farming, and evaluated the outcomes of increased crop-livestock integration. Mixed enterprise scenarios involving sheep provided more income than specialized enterprises, and capitalized on a lower price of on-farm maize grain, efficient utilization of surplus labor, and availability of common land. Labor and management income was greatest for the unintegrated and partially integrated crop and livestock scenarios. It was more profitable for producers to sell excess grain and maize stover, and use common land to feed the livestock, suggesting that increased integration does not always result in improved outcomes. The results are consistent with a system not yet pushed to the point where integration is inevitable. For all sets of scenarios, the model structure was able to accommodate subtle management differences to produce appropriate biophysical, labor, and economic outcomes. We conclude there is potential to use similar model development methods to describe other crop-livestock systems, thus providing tools for learning, scenario analysis, and impact assessment. eng

Disponible en línea

Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior e Internet

Con tecnología Koha