Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender-related differences in the apparent timing of skeletal density bands in the reef-building coral Siderastrea siderea

  • Report
  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Density banding in skeletons of reef-building corals is a valuable source of proxy environmental data. However, skeletal growth strategy has a significant impact on the apparent timing of density-band formation. Some corals employ a strategy where the tissue occupies previously formed skeleton during as the new band forms, which leads to differences between the actual and apparent band timing. To investigate this effect, we collected cores from female and male colonies of Siderastrea siderea and report tissue thicknesses and density-related growth parameters over a 17-yr interval. Correlating these results with monthly sea surface temperature (SST) shows that maximum skeletal density in the female coincides with low winter SSTs, whereas in the male, it coincides with high summer SSTs. Furthermore, maximum skeletal densities in the female coincide with peak Sr/Ca values, whereas in the male, they coincide with low Sr/Ca values. Both results indicate a 6-month difference in the apparent timing of density-band formation between genders. Examination of skeletal extension rates also show that the male has thicker tissue and extends faster, whereas the female has thinner tissue and a denser skeleton—but both calcify at the same rate. The correlation between extension and calcification, combined with the fact that density banding arises from thickening of the skeleton throughout the depth reached by the tissue layer, implies that S. siderea has the same growth strategy as massive Porites, investing its calcification resources into linear extension. In addition, differences in tissue thicknesses suggest that females offset the greater energy requirements of gamete production by generating less tissue, resulting in differences in the apparent timing of density-band formation. Such gender-related offsets may be common in other corals and require that environmental reconstructions be made from sexed colonies and that, in fossil corals where sex cannot be determined, reconstructions must be duplicated in different colonies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Barnes DJ, Lough JM (1993) On the nature and causes of density banding in massive coral skeletons. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 167:91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes DJ, Lough JM (1996) Coral skeletons: storage and recovery of environmental information. Global Change Biol 2:569–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes DJ, Taylor RB, Lough JM (1995) On the inclusion of trace materials into massive coral skeletons. Part II: distortions in skeletal records of annual climate cycles due to growth processes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 194:251–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral-Tena RA, Reyes-Bonilla H, Lluch-Cota S, Paz-García DA, Calderón-Aguilera LE, Norzagaray-López O, Balar EF (2013) Different calcification rates in males and females of the coral Porites panamensis in the Gulf of California. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 476:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns SD (1982) Stony corals (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa, Scleractinia) of Carrie Bow Cay, Belize. Smith Contr Mar Sci 12:271–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Carricart-Ganivet JP (2007) Annual density banding in massive coral skeletons: result of growth strategies to inhabit reefs with high microborers’ activity? Mar Biol 153:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carricart-Ganivet JP, Barnes DJ (2007) Densitometry from digitized images of X-radiographs: Methodology for measurement of coral skeletal density. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 344:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo KD, Ries JB, Weiss JM (2011) Declining coral skeletal extension for forereef colonies of Siderastrea siderea on the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef System. Southern Belize. PLoS ONE 6(2):e14615. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen CD, Roth AA (1975) Effect of temperature and temperature adaptation on calcification rate in the hermatypic coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Biol 33:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dávalos-Dehullu E, Hernández-Arana H, Carricart-Ganivet JP (2008) On the causes of density banding in skeletons of corals of the genus Montastraea. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 365:142–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge RE, Brass GW (1984) Skeletal extension, density and calcification of the reef coral Montastrea annularis: St. Croix. US Virgin Islands. Bull Mar Sci 34:288–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge RE, García R, Szmant AM, Swart PK, Forrester A, Leder JJ (1992) Skeletal structural basis of density banding in the reef coral Montastrea annularis. Proc 7th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:186–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds PJ (2005) The effect of sub-lethal increases in temperature on the growth and population trajectories of three scleractinian corals on the southern Great Barrier Reef. Oecologia 146:350–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gagan MK, Dunbar GB, Suzukiet A (2012) The effect of skeletal mass accumulation in Porites on coral Sr/Ca and d18O paleothermometry. Paleoceanogr 27: PA1203. doi:10.1029/2011PA002215

  • Glynn PW, Gassman NJ, Eakin CM, Cortes J, Smith DB, Guzman HM (1991) Reef coral reproduction in the eastern Pacific: Costa Rica, Panama, and Galapagos Islands (Ecuador) I. Pocilloporidae. Mar Biol 109:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn PW, Colley SB, Eakin CM, Smith DB, Corte′s J, Gassman NJ, Guzmán HM, Del Rosario JB, Feingold JS (1994) Reef coral reproduction in the eastern Pacific: Costa Rica, Panamá, and the Galápagos Islands (Ecuador). II. Poritidae. Mar Biol 118:191–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán HM, Jarvis KE (1996) Vanadium century record from Caribbean reef corals: A tracer of oil pollution in Panama. Ambio 25:523–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán HM, Tudhope AW (1998) Seasonal variation in skeletal extension rate and stable isotopic (13C/12C and 18O/16O) composition in response to several environmental variables in the Caribbean reef coral Siderastrea siderea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 166:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall VR, Hughes TP (1996) Reproductive strategies of modular organisms: comparative studies of reef-building corals. Ecology 77:950–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmle KP, Dodge RE, Ketcham RA (2000) Skeletal architecture and density banding in Diploria strigosa by X-ray computed tomography. Proc 9th Int Coral Reef Symp 1: 365–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JH, Shinn EA, Halley RB, Lidz B (1976) Sclerochronology: A tool for interpreting past environments. Geology 4:361–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson DW, Buddemeier RW, Smith SV (1972) Coral chronometers: seasonal growth bands in reef corals. Science 177:270–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leuzinger S, Anthony KRN, Willis BL (2003) Reproductive energy investment in corals: scaling with module size. Oecologia 136:524–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lough JM (2010) Climate records from corals. WIREs Clim Change 1:318–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall AT, Clode P (2004) Calcification rate and the effect of temperature in a zooxanthellate and an azooxanthellate scleractinian reef coral. Coral Reefs 23:218–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Martínez RE, Ruíz-Rentería F, van Tussenbroek B, Barba-Santos G, Escalante-Mancera E, Jordán-Garza G, Jordán-Dahlgren E (2010) Environmental state and tendencies of the Puerto Morelos CARICOMP site, Mexico. Rev Biol Trop 58:23–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal Y, Field MP, Sherrell RM (1999) Precise determination of element/calcium ratios in calcareous samples using sector field inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 71:3248–3253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saenger C, Cohen LA, Oppo DW, Halley RB, Carilli JE (2009) Surface-temperature trends and variability in the low-latitude North Atlantic since 1552. Nat Geosci 2:492–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schrag DP (1999) Rapid analysis of high-precision Sr/Ca ratios in corals and other marine carbonates. Paleoceanogr 14:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen CC, Lee T, Chen CY, Wang CH, Dai CF, Li LA (1996) The calibration of D[Sr/Ca] versus sea surface temperature relationship for Porites corals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:3849–3858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szmant AM (1986) Reproductive ecology of Caribbean reef corals. Coral Reefs 5:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RB, Barnes DJ, Lough JM (1993) Simple models of density band formation in massive corals. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 167:109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vago R, Dubinsky Z, Genin A, Ben-Zion M, Kizner Z (1997) Growth rates of three symbiotic corals in the Red Sea. Limnol Oceanogr 42:1814–1819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vásquez-Bedoya LF, Cohen AL, Oppo DW, Blanchon P (2012) Corals record persistent multidecadal SST variability in the Atlantic Warm Pool since 1775 AD. Paleooceanography 27: PA3231, doi:10.1029/2012PA002313

  • Veron JEN (2000) Corals of the world, vol. 2. Australian Institute of Marine Science & CRR Qld Pty Ltd, Australia

  • Wórum FP, Carricart-Ganivet JP, Benson L, Golicher D (2007) Simulation and observations of annual density banding in skeletons of Montastraea (Cnidaria : Scleractinia) growing under thermal stress associated with ocean warming. Limnol Oceanogr 52:2317–2323

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The comments of Kevin Helmle notably improved the manuscript. We thank R. Smith, P. Zapata and A. Mendoza-López (UASA, ICMyL, UNAM) and N. Cantin (WHOI) for their assistance in the field; E. Escalante-Mancera and F. Ruíz-Rentería (UASA, ICMyL, UNAM) provided the SST data set; A.M. Tarrant (WHOI) helped with histological sample preparation and analysis, and M. Eagle-Gonneea (WHOI) helped with Sr/Ca measurements. L.F.V.-B. acknowledges a CONACyT scholarship from Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, UNAM and a stay with A. Cohen in the Department of Geology and Geophysics (WHOI). N.C.-T. acknowledges a postdoctoral fellowship from the European Union (FORCE project). This research was supported by grants from CONACyT to P.B. (project 104358) and European Union to J.P.C.-G. (FORCE project).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Carricart-Ganivet.

Additional information

Communicated by Geology Editor Prof. Bernhard Riegl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carricart-Ganivet, J.P., Vásquez-Bedoya, L.F., Cabanillas-Terán, N. et al. Gender-related differences in the apparent timing of skeletal density bands in the reef-building coral Siderastrea siderea . Coral Reefs 32, 769–777 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-013-1028-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-013-1028-y

Keywords