Skip to main content
Log in

Use of indigenous knowledge for rapidly assessing trends in biodiversity: a case study from Chiapas, Mexico

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to evaluate the usefulness of rapid surveys of indigenous knowledge for assessing trends in biodiversity, a case study was undertaken in two rural communities, Juznajab and Muquenal, in Chiapas, Mexico. This involved the use of a variety of rapid rural appraisal (RRA) and participatory rural appraisal (PRA) techniques, including semi-structured interviews, transect walks and participatory mapping. These approaches were used in conjunction with analysis of land use maps and aerial photographs to evaluate recent changes in vegetation cover and abundance of utilised species. In both communities, the extent of forest cover was considered by local people to have declined substantially in recent decades, with an annual decline in forest cover of 0.3% and 0.6% estimated by local people in Juznajab and Muquenal, respectively. Results from RRA indicated that this has been accompanied by significant declines in the abundance of useful species. In Juznajab 60% and 79%, and in Muquenal 96% and 85% of plants and animal species, respectively, were considered to have declined within living memory. These declines appear to result from over-utilization as well as habitat changes. For example, most of the tree species used for timber and the animal species used for meat were considered to have declined substantially in both communities. These results indicate that indigenous knowledge is potentially a valuable source of information about biodiversity trends, which could be assessed during Rapid Biodiversity Assessments and incorporated into the process of resource management by local communities. However, the contradictions recorded between assessments of vegetation change by local people and data obtained from other sources indicates the need for caution in the use of indigenous knowledge for this purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Alemán-Santillán T (1989) Los sistemas de producció n forestal y agrícola de roza. In: Vázquez P (ed) El subdesarrollo agrícola en los altos de Chiapas, pp 83–151. Universidad Autó noma Chapingo, Chapingo, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie AJ, Majer JD and Oliver I (1993) Rapid biodiversity assessment: a review. In: Beattie A (ed) Rapid Biodiversity Assessment, Proceedings of the Biodiversity Workshop, 3- 4 May 1993, pp 4–14. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

  • Benz B, Santana F, Pineda R, Cevallos J, Robles L and de Niz D (1994) Characterisation of Mestizo plant use in the sierra de Manantlan, Jalisco-Colima, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 14(1): 23–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown K (1994) Approaches to valuing plant medicines: the economics of culture or the culture of economics? Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 734–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley J and Gauld I (1994) Measuring and monitoring forest biodiversity. In: Boyle T and Boontawee B (eds) Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity in Tropical and Temperate Forests, pp 19–46. CIFOR, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess J (1993) Timber production, timber trade and tropical deforestation. Ambio 22: 136–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter J (ed) (1996) Recent approaches to participatory forest resource assessment. Rural Development Forestry Study Guide 2. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK

  • Chambers R (1992) Rural appraisal: rapid, relaxed and participatory. Institute of Development Studies, discussion paper 311. Institute of Development Studies, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier GA (1975) Fields of the Tzotzil: the ecological bases of tradition in higland Chiapas. The University of Texas Press, Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall A (1995) Towards participatory practice: PRA and the participatory process In: de Koning K (ed) Participation and Health. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Case D (1990) The community's toolbox: the idea, methods and tools for participatory assessment, monitoring and evaluation. In: Community Forestry Field Manual. FAO, Bangkok, Thailand, 146 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons L and Feer F (1990) Neotropical Rainforest Mammals. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores J (1983) Nombres usados por las Mayas para designar a la vegetació n. Instituto Nació nal de Investigació nes Sobre Recursos Bioticos, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberger KS (1994) Tree and land tenure: rapid appraisal tools. Community Forestry Field Manual 4. FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Espinosa M, Quintana-Ascencio PFS, Ramírez-Marcial N and Gaytán-Guzmán P (1991) Secondary succession in disturbed Pinus-Quercus forests in the highlands of Chiapas, México. Journal of Vegetation Science 2: 351–360

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Espinosa M, Ochoa-Gaona S, Ramírez-Marcial N, Quintana-Ascencio PF (1995) Current land-use trends and conservation of old-growth forest habitats in the highlands of Chiapas, México. In: Wilson M and Sader S (eds) Conservation of Neotropical Migratory Birds in Mexico, pp 190–198. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station, Miscellaneous publication 727, Orono, ME

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA, Lefkowitz DA and Skole DL (1991) Changes in the landscape of Latin America between 1850 and 1985. I. Progressive loss of forests. Forest Ecology and Management 38: 143–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes M and Chambers R (1980) Indigenous technical knowledge: analysis, implications and issues. In: Brokenshaw D, Warren D and Werner O (eds) Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development, pp 323–334. University Press of America, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • MD INEGI (1991) VII census agricola-ganadero. INEGI (the Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e Informatica), Mexico

  • March I (1989) La conservació n de la biodiversidad en el aprovechamiento de los recursos fore-stales en Chiapas. Taller Forestal CIES, San Cristobal, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • March I and Flamenco A (1996) Evaluació n rapida de la deforestació n an las areas naturales protegidas de Chiapas 1970- 1993. ECOSUR, San Cristó bal, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin G (1995) Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual. A People and Plants Conservation Manual. WWF International, UNESCO and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda F (1952) La vegetació n de Chiapas. Departamento de Prensa y Turismo, Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton AC, Leakey RRB and Mesén JF (1993) Genetic variation in mahoganies: its importance, capture and utilization. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 114–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton AC, Cornelius JP, Baker P, Gillies AC, Hernández M, Ramnarine R and Mesén JF (1996) Mahogany as a genetic resource. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 122(1): 61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss R (1990) Indicators for biodiversity. Conservation Biology 4(4): 356–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver I and Beattie AJ (1993) A possible method for the rapid assessment of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 7: 562–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson R and Chalif E (1990) Aves de Mexico. Diana

  • Pool Novelo L (1997) Intensificació n de la agricultura tradicional y cambios de uso del suelo. In: Parra Vásquez MR and Díaz Hernández BM (eds) Los Altos de Chiapas: agricultura y crisis rural, pp 1–22. ECOSUR, Chiapas, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J (1995) Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development 23(8): 1247–1263

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamoorthy T, Bye R, Lot A and Fa J (eds) (1993) Biological Diversity of Mexico. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford K and Padoch C (eds) (1992) Conservation of Neotropical Forests. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards M (1991) The forest ejidos of south-east Mexico. Commonwealth Forestry Review 70: 290–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodan BD, Newton AC and Verissimo A (1992) Mahogany conservation: status and policy initiatives. Environmental Conservation 19: 331–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe R, Sharma P and Browder J (1992) Deforestation: problems, causes, and concerns. In: Sharma N (ed) Managing the World's Forests, pp 33–45. Kendall Hunt

  • Soto Pinto ML (1987) Plantas utiles del centro de Chiapas subregion San Cristobal. San Cristó bal, CIES Informe, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker D, Sinclair F and Thapa B (1995) Incorporation of indigenous knowledge and perspectives in agroforestry development. Agroforestry Systems 30: 235–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore TC (1990) An Introduction to Tropical Rain Forests. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1995) Mexico: Resource Conservation and Forest Sector Review. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hellier, A., Newton, A.C. & Gaona, S.O. Use of indigenous knowledge for rapidly assessing trends in biodiversity: a case study from Chiapas, Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 869–889 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008862005556

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008862005556