Vista normal Vista MARC

Fire governance research in the tropics: a configurative review and outline of a research agenda

Por: Neger, Christoph [autor].
Monzón Alvarado, Claudia María [autora] | Guibrunet, Louise [autora].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 en línea Artículo en línea Tipo de contenido: texto Tipo de medio: computadora Tipo de portador: recurso en líneaTema(s): Incendios forestales | Gobernanza ambiental | Manejo de incendios forestalesTema(s) en inglés: Forest fires | Environmental governance | Forest fire managementDescriptor(es) geográficos: Trópicos Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso En: Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. Volumen 45, número 2 (May 2024) 332–346. --ISSN: 1467-9493Número de sistema: 64616Resumen:
Inglés

Fire is a highly relevant governance challenge in the tropics: altered fire regimes, among other phenomena, threaten the persistence of various ecosystems. Fire is also widely used by smallholders. Yet, wildfires can put people’s livelihoods in danger through direct damages and by impoverishing ecosystem services. Conventional approaches have sought to suppress any type of fire in the landscape. However, since the late twentieth century, researchers and practitioners have recognized the benefits of strategic fire use and, in some cases, of local fire use traditions. In many tropical areas, the coexistence and interaction of the conventional (‘suppression-only’) approach, integrated approaches, and communities’ traditional ways of using fire, create a complex network of actors with different interests and outlooks. The ways these actors make decisions and interact can be summed up under the notion of fire governance. There is a growing body of literature dealing with this kind of situations, although they do not always mention the term governance. This paper thematically analyses 38 studies in this field, showing that research has been scattered and often addresses the issue partially, leaving out key aspects of environmental governance. Based on this analysis, the paper proposes a more connected and holistic research agenda.

Recurso en línea: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12534
Lista(s) en las que aparece este ítem: AHMRET-Campeche
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO40000064616

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

Fire is a highly relevant governance challenge in the tropics: altered fire regimes, among other phenomena, threaten the persistence of various ecosystems. Fire is also widely used by smallholders. Yet, wildfires can put people’s livelihoods in danger through direct damages and by impoverishing ecosystem services. Conventional approaches have sought to suppress any type of fire in the landscape. However, since the late twentieth century, researchers and practitioners have recognized the benefits of strategic fire use and, in some cases, of local fire use traditions. In many tropical areas, the coexistence and interaction of the conventional (‘suppression-only’) approach, integrated approaches, and communities’ traditional ways of using fire, create a complex network of actors with different interests and outlooks. The ways these actors make decisions and interact can be summed up under the notion of fire governance. There is a growing body of literature dealing with this kind of situations, although they do not always mention the term governance. This paper thematically analyses 38 studies in this field, showing that research has been scattered and often addresses the issue partially, leaving out key aspects of environmental governance. Based on this analysis, the paper proposes a more connected and holistic research agenda. eng

Con tecnología Koha