Vista normal Vista MARC

Socioecological conflicts in Mexico: trends and gaps in the regional analysis

Rodríguez Robayo, Karla Juliana [autora] | Trujillo Miranda, Alma L [autora] | Méndez López, María Elena [autora] | Porter Bolland, Luciana [autora] | Monzón Alvarado, Claudia María [autora] | Llamas Torres, Irina [autora] | Reyes Maturano, Ivet [autora] | León Gónzalez, Jibram [autor] | Juárez Téllez, Lilian [autora] | Ruenes Morales, María del Rocío [autora] | Rivera De Velasco, Mariana [autor] | Chan Chuc, Nicolás [autor].
Tipo de material: Artículo en línea Artículo en línea Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Conflicto socioambiental | Sistemas socioecológicos | Manejo de conflictos | Cambio climáticoTema(s) en inglés: Socio environmental | Socioecological systems | Conflict management | Climatic changeDescriptor(es) geográficos: México Nota de acceso: Acceso en línea sin restricciones En: Environmental Science and Policy. Volumen 127, (January 2022), páginas 12-21. --ISSN: 1873-6416Número de sistema: 61570Resumen:
Inglés

Global economic growth and the problems generated by climate change will cause an increase in the occurrence and violence of socioecological conflicts in the coming decades. To understand these trends, it is important to determine the current state of the conflicts. In Mexico efforts have been made to analyze socioecological conflicts at the regional level. However, it is important to know the conceptual approach under which this has been addressed and what variables that reflect the complexity of its socio-ecological context have been considered. The objective of this article is to review the trends and information gaps in the regional analysis of socio-ecological conflicts in Mexico, using a systematic review of documentary information sources and geovisualizers. As a result, only 30.6% of the information sources feature a defined conceptual approach. The conflicts are characterized by the drivers and social or environmental impacts in all studies. On the other hand, information gaps include the elucidation of management alternatives (41.7%) and future scenarios (22.2%), the description (25%) and analysis of the implied ecosystem services (13.9%), a gender approach (16.7%), an analysis of the normative frame (8.3%), and the exogenous conditions associated with environmental patterns (38.9%) such as the influence of climate change. We argue that a regional analysis of conflicts using a socioecological approach integrating environmental and social components could allow a comparative analysis. It could also provide an understanding of the contextual variables and underlying causes of conflicts. This information is necessary for socioecological conflict management towards peaceful resolutions.

Recurso en línea: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901121002884
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE) 		ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400000061570

Acceso en línea sin restricciones

Global economic growth and the problems generated by climate change will cause an increase in the occurrence and violence of socioecological conflicts in the coming decades. To understand these trends, it is important to determine the current state of the conflicts. In Mexico efforts have been made to analyze socioecological conflicts at the regional level. However, it is important to know the conceptual approach under which this has been addressed and what variables that reflect the complexity of its socio-ecological context have been considered. The objective of this article is to review the trends and information gaps in the regional analysis of socio-ecological conflicts in Mexico, using a systematic review of documentary information sources and geovisualizers. As a result, only 30.6% of the information sources feature a defined conceptual approach. The conflicts are characterized by the drivers and social or environmental impacts in all studies. On the other hand, information gaps include the elucidation of management alternatives (41.7%) and future scenarios (22.2%), the description (25%) and analysis of the implied ecosystem services (13.9%), a gender approach (16.7%), an analysis of the normative frame (8.3%), and the exogenous conditions associated with environmental patterns (38.9%) such as the influence of climate change. We argue that a regional analysis of conflicts using a socioecological approach integrating environmental and social components could allow a comparative analysis. It could also provide an understanding of the contextual variables and underlying causes of conflicts. This information is necessary for socioecological conflict management towards peaceful resolutions. eng

Con tecnología Koha