Vista normal Vista MARC

The value of plants for the mayan stingless honey bee Melipona beecheii (Apidae: Meliponini): a pollen-based study in the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico

Villanueva Gutiérrez, Rogel, 1952-2019 [autor] | Roubik, David Ward, 1951- [autor] | Collí Ucán, Wilberto [autor] | Tuz Novelo, Margarito [autor].
Tipo de material: Capítulo de libro
 impreso(a) 
 
  y electrónico  
  Capítulo de libro impreso(a) y electrónico Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Melipona beecheii | Abejas sin aguijón | Polen | Árboles forestalesTema(s) en inglés: Melipona beecheii | Stingless bees | Pollen | Forest treesDescriptor(es) geográficos: Quintana Roo (México) Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso Nota general: Para consultar el capítulo impreso véase el libro con la clasificación 595.799 P67, en SIBE-San Cristóbal En: Pot-pollen in stingless bee melittology / Patricia Vit, Silvia R.M. Pedro, David W. Roubik, editors. Cham, Switzerland, German : Springer International Publishing AG, 2018. páginas 67-76. --ISBN: 978-3-319-61838-8Número de sistema: 39836Resumen:
Inglés

We studied 24 colonies of Melipona, at the whole-colony level, by taking 34 pollen samples at 4 sites in the forested Yucatán Peninsular state of Quintana Roo. Samples were taken over a 20-year period. Our sampling involved removing pollen stored in each pot within the bee nest, acetolyzing the pollen, adding quantified Lycopodium spores to determine pollen species volume, and then identifying each pollen type to species using a light microscope, with our key and reference collection. Studies covered both the wet and dry season, 1996–2016. The bee population was analyzed considering (1) pollen-type frequency, (2) predominance, and (3) importance or volume. The last method, at the population level, identified significant pollen resource selection by the bee, with clear implications for conservation, management, and ecological study. Plants were ranked differently using the different methods, but the best method, using spores to quantify pollen volume, identified Fabaceae, Burseraceae, Myrtaceae, Solanaceae, and Bixaceae (formerly Cochlospermaceae) (32 total species or pollen types) as the most important resources, among 27 families, 47 genera, and 68 total species or pollen types. Three legumes, Gliricidia, Senna, and Lonchocarpus, were highly preferred, two of which provide nectar and pollen, and one (Senna) having only pollen. Further, each of the top families belongs to different plant orders; thus, bees were highly generalized in flower associations. They consistently use only certain forest trees and, occasionally, shrubs, and their competition with naturalized African honeybees, studied together at the same places, chiefly involves nectar and pollen of early successional woody species—Bursera and Eugenia. Other important pollen sources were Cochlospermum, Physalis, Gymnanthes, Myrcianthes, Thrinax, Chamaedorea, and Chrysophyllum.

Recurso en línea: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-61839-5_5
Lista(s) en las que aparece este ítem: Wilberto Collí Ucán
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Capítulos de libro Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400398364677
Capítulos de libro Biblioteca San Cristóbal

Texto en la configuración de la biblioteca San Cristóbal

Acervo General (AG)
ECOSUR 595.799 P67 Disponible CFS01000039836

Para consultar el capítulo impreso véase el libro con la clasificación 595.799 P67, en SIBE-San Cristóbal

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

We studied 24 colonies of Melipona, at the whole-colony level, by taking 34 pollen samples at 4 sites in the forested Yucatán Peninsular state of Quintana Roo. Samples were taken over a 20-year period. Our sampling involved removing pollen stored in each pot within the bee nest, acetolyzing the pollen, adding quantified Lycopodium spores to determine pollen species volume, and then identifying each pollen type to species using a light microscope, with our key and reference collection. Studies covered both the wet and dry season, 1996–2016. The bee population was analyzed considering (1) pollen-type frequency, (2) predominance, and (3) importance or volume. The last method, at the population level, identified significant pollen resource selection by the bee, with clear implications for conservation, management, and ecological study. Plants were ranked differently using the different methods, but the best method, using spores to quantify pollen volume, identified Fabaceae, Burseraceae, Myrtaceae, Solanaceae, and Bixaceae (formerly Cochlospermaceae) (32 total species or pollen types) as the most important resources, among 27 families, 47 genera, and 68 total species or pollen types. Three legumes, Gliricidia, Senna, and Lonchocarpus, were highly preferred, two of which provide nectar and pollen, and one (Senna) having only pollen. Further, each of the top families belongs to different plant orders; thus, bees were highly generalized in flower associations. They consistently use only certain forest trees and, occasionally, shrubs, and their competition with naturalized African honeybees, studied together at the same places, chiefly involves nectar and pollen of early successional woody species—Bursera and Eugenia. Other important pollen sources were Cochlospermum, Physalis, Gymnanthes, Myrcianthes, Thrinax, Chamaedorea, and Chrysophyllum. eng

Haga clic en una imagen para verla en el visor de imágenes

Con tecnología Koha