Vista normal Vista MARC

Dung beetle community (Coleoptera: scarabaeidae: scarabaeinae) in a tropical landscape at the Lachua region, Guatemala

Avendaño Mendoza, Carlos Enrique [autor] | Morón Ríos, Alejandro, 1960- [autor] | Cano Dávila, Enio [autor] | León Cortés, Jorge Leonel [autor].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 impreso(a) 
 
  y electrónico  
  Artículo impreso(a) y electrónico Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Escarabajos copronecrófagos | Diversidad biológica | ScarabaeidaeDescriptor(es) geográficos: Parque Nacional Laguna Lachuá, Cobán (Alta Verapaz, Guatemala) Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso En: Biodiversity and Conservation. Volumen 14, número 4 (april 2005), páginas 801-822. --ISSN: 0960-3115Número de sistema: 36823Resumen:
Inglés

Biological diversity conservation within natural reserves has been prioritized, but conservation efforts outside protected areas (where most human activities take place) have been very little considered. In this scenario, an alternative agricultural practice that may reduce the impacts of fragmentation in outer landscapes is a perforation process, which involves conservation in agricultural fields surrounded by continuous forests. Such practices enhance the positive impact of ecological services on fields. In this study we analyzed the biological diversity state in perforation fields and their surrounding forests. The analysis was done using dung beetles as biological indicators. A nested pattern in dung beetles distribution was found, which ordered the surrounding continuous forest sites as the ones with the highest species richness, followed by the perforation fields, and placed the fragmentation practice fields (continuous agricultural fields surrounding forest patches) with the lowest one. Indicator species for perforation fields and surrounding continuous forests were chosen. In general, perforation practice fields differed in composition, based upon functional groups richness and identity; it also contained a higher species richness than the fragmentation practice. Agricultural practices that enhance biological diversity conservation such as perforation, should be recommended and considered in natural resource management by local communities in order to take advantage of ecological services that otherwise may be gradually lost.

Recurso en línea: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0651-x
Lista(s) en las que aparece este ítem: Conservación-Campeche
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Info Vol Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400368234310
Artículos Biblioteca San Cristóbal

Texto en la configuración de la biblioteca San Cristóbal

Artículos Hemeroteca (AR HM)
ECOSUR 001 Disponible 230819CB5409

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

Biological diversity conservation within natural reserves has been prioritized, but conservation efforts outside protected areas (where most human activities take place) have been very little considered. In this scenario, an alternative agricultural practice that may reduce the impacts of fragmentation in outer landscapes is a perforation process, which involves conservation in agricultural fields surrounded by continuous forests. Such practices enhance the positive impact of ecological services on fields. In this study we analyzed the biological diversity state in perforation fields and their surrounding forests. The analysis was done using dung beetles as biological indicators. A nested pattern in dung beetles distribution was found, which ordered the surrounding continuous forest sites as the ones with the highest species richness, followed by the perforation fields, and placed the fragmentation practice fields (continuous agricultural fields surrounding forest patches) with the lowest one. Indicator species for perforation fields and surrounding continuous forests were chosen. In general, perforation practice fields differed in composition, based upon functional groups richness and identity; it also contained a higher species richness than the fragmentation practice. Agricultural practices that enhance biological diversity conservation such as perforation, should be recommended and considered in natural resource management by local communities in order to take advantage of ecological services that otherwise may be gradually lost. eng

Con tecnología Koha