Vista normal Vista MARC

A male-female longevity paradox in medfly cohorts

Liedo Fernández, Pablo | Carey, James R [autor/a] | Orozco Dávila, Dina [autor/a] | Tatar, Marc [autor/a] | Vaupel, James W [autor/a].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 impreso(a) 
 
  y electrónico  
  Artículo impreso(a) y electrónico Tema(s): Moscas de la fruta | Ceratitis capitata | Edad | MortalidadClasificación: AR/632.774 / M33 Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso En: Journal of Animal Ecology. volumen 64 (1995), páginas 107-116. --ISSN: 0021-8790Número de sistema: 19361Resumen:
Inglés

A long-standing question in biology is whether longevity is greater in females or in males for most non-human species. This is an open question for the majority of species because little is known about the nature of the underlying mortality differences. 2. Examination of mortality data on approximately 600 000 medflies of each sex revealed a demographic paradox-male medflies possessed the higher life expectancy (average longevity) but female medflies were usually the last to die. 3. The underlying demographic cause of this incongruency was a male-female mortality crossover-females exhibited higher mortality than males to around 3 weeks, lower mortality than males from about 3-8 weeks, and mortality approximately equal to that of males thereafter. 4. The findings help explain the ambiguity of male-female longevity differences in the literature, suggest that relative male-female survival cannot be used as a proxy for sex mortality differences, shed light on sex biasing of older ages, and undercore the difficulties with comparative aspects of ageing. 5. We propose a general framework for sex-mortality differentials in which the underlying mortality factors are grouped into three interrelated categories: constitutional endowment, reproductive biology and behaviour. This framework provides conceptual structure as well as insights into how complex patterns in the sex-mortality ratio can arise.

Recurso en línea: http://www.jstor.org/stable/5831?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Lista(s) en las que aparece este ítem: Bibliografía DEAMP
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Info Vol Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400193613347
Artículos Biblioteca San Cristóbal

Texto en la configuración de la biblioteca San Cristóbal

Artículos (AR)
ECOSUR AR 632.774 M33 001 Disponible SER000758
Artículos Biblioteca Tapachula

Texto colocado en la configuración de la biblioteca Tapachula

Artículos (AR)
ECOSUR AR 632.774 M33 002 Disponible ECO020010342
Artículos Biblioteca Tapachula

Texto colocado en la configuración de la biblioteca Tapachula

Artículos (AR)
ECOSUR AR 632.774 M33 003 Disponible ECO020010343

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

Requerimiento del sistema: Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior e Internet

A long-standing question in biology is whether longevity is greater in females or in males for most non-human species. This is an open question for the majority of species because little is known about the nature of the underlying mortality differences. 2. Examination of mortality data on approximately 600 000 medflies of each sex revealed a demographic paradox-male medflies possessed the higher life expectancy (average longevity) but female medflies were usually the last to die. 3. The underlying demographic cause of this incongruency was a male-female mortality crossover-females exhibited higher mortality than males to around 3 weeks, lower mortality than males from about 3-8 weeks, and mortality approximately equal to that of males thereafter. 4. The findings help explain the ambiguity of male-female longevity differences in the literature, suggest that relative male-female survival cannot be used as a proxy for sex mortality differences, shed light on sex biasing of older ages, and undercore the difficulties with comparative aspects of ageing. 5. We propose a general framework for sex-mortality differentials in which the underlying mortality factors are grouped into three interrelated categories: constitutional endowment, reproductive biology and behaviour. This framework provides conceptual structure as well as insights into how complex patterns in the sex-mortality ratio can arise. eng

Disponible en línea

Con tecnología Koha