Vista normal Vista MARC

Effect of live fences of Gliricidia sepium on CO2 fluxes in tropical livestock systems

Villanueva López, Gilberto [autor] | Casanova Lugo, Fernando [autor] | Martínez Zurimendi, Pablo [autor] | Parsons, D [autor/a] | Aguilar Solis, L. A [autor/a].
Tipo de material: Artículo en línea Artículo en línea Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Ganadería | Gliricidia sepium | Emisiones de carbono | Gases de efecto invernadero | Deforestación | Sistemas silvopastorilesTema(s) en inglés: Livestock | Gliricidia sepium | Carbon emissions | Greenhouse gases | Deforestation | Silvopastoral systemsDescriptor(es) geográficos: Tacotalpa (Tabasco, México) Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso En: Soil Use and Management. Volumen 32, número 4 (December 2016), páginas 553-564. --ISSN: 1475-2743Número de sistema: 12269Resumen:
Inglés

Live fences have the potential to improve microclimatic conditions, moderate soil CO2 fluxes and function as carbon sinks. We quantified variation in soil CO2 fluxes from livestock silvopastoral systems under the canopies of live fences (LF), formed by Gliricidia sepium trees, or artificial fences (AF). We determined the responses of soil CO2 fluxes to environmental factors, including diurnal and seasonal variations in temperature and relative humidity in each fencing system. Measurements were made from April to June (dry season) and from July to September (rainy season), 2012. Fluxes were similar between the two livestock systems; LF emitted 1.00 lmol CO2/m²/s and AF 1.02 lmol CO2/m²/s. Soil temperatures at 5 cm depth were 3% warmer in AF than in LF, and relative humidity was 16% greater in LF than in AF. Seasonal variation in temperature greatly affected soil CO2 fluxes, which changed seasonally in parallel with temperature of the topsoil and relative humidity at 1 m height, peaking in late summer. Fluxes in LF and AF were greater in the rainy season (1.1 lmol CO2/m²/s, for both systems), when soil temperature was cooler and relative humidity was greatest, than during the dry season (0.9 lmol CO2/m²/s, for both systems). Soil fluxes were larger at night (00:00-06:00 h), when soil temperature was cooler and relative humidity greater, than during the morning (6:00-12:00 h), when soil temperature was warmer and relative humidity was less.The presence of G. sepium trees in LF did not influence soil CO2 fluxes.

Recurso en línea: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sum.12311
Lista(s) en las que aparece este ítem: GANADERIA SUSTENTABLE Y CAMBIO CLIMATICO
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE) 		ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400122693961

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

Live fences have the potential to improve microclimatic conditions, moderate soil CO2 fluxes and function as carbon sinks. We quantified variation in soil CO2 fluxes from livestock silvopastoral systems under the canopies of live fences (LF), formed by Gliricidia sepium trees, or artificial fences (AF). We determined the responses of soil CO2 fluxes to environmental factors, including diurnal and seasonal variations in temperature and relative humidity in each fencing system. Measurements were made from April to June (dry season) and from July to September (rainy season), 2012. Fluxes were similar between the two livestock systems; LF emitted 1.00 lmol CO2/m²/s and AF 1.02 lmol CO2/m²/s. Soil temperatures at 5 cm depth were 3% warmer in AF than in LF, and relative humidity was 16% greater in LF than in AF. Seasonal variation in temperature greatly affected soil CO2 fluxes, which changed seasonally in parallel with temperature of the topsoil and relative humidity at 1 m height, peaking in late summer. Fluxes in LF and AF were greater in the rainy season (1.1 lmol CO2/m²/s, for both systems), when soil temperature was cooler and relative humidity was greatest, than during the dry season (0.9 lmol CO2/m²/s, for both systems). Soil fluxes were larger at night (00:00-06:00 h), when soil temperature was cooler and relative humidity greater, than during the morning (6:00-12:00 h), when soil temperature was warmer and relative humidity was less.The presence of G. sepium trees in LF did not influence soil CO2 fluxes. eng

Con tecnología Koha