Efecto del manejo sobre la diversidad de árboles en vegetación secundaria en la Reserva de la Biosfera de Calakmul, Campeche, México
Tipo de material:
- Effect of management on tree diversity in secondary vegetation in the Biosphere Reserve of Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico [Título paralelo]
- Vegetación secundaria
- Artfrosur
- Secondary vegetation
- Composición botánica
- Botanical composition
- Ordenación forestal
- Forest management
- Bosques tropicales secos
- Tropical dry forest
- Puebla de Morelia, Calakmul (Campeche, México)
- Kilómetro Ciento Veinte, Calakmul (Campeche, México)
- Kilometro Ciento Veinte, Calakmul (Campeche, Mexico)
- Reserva de la Biosfera Calakmul (Campeche, México)
- Puebla de Morelia, Calakmul (Campeche, Mexico)
- Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Campeche, Mexico)
- Ciencias agropecuarias y biotecnología Ciencias agrarias Ciencia forestal -- Ordenación de montes
- Disponible en línea
Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Colección | Estado | Código de barras | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | Biblioteca Electrónica Recursos en línea (RE) | ECOSUR | Recurso digital | ECO400543176895 |
Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso
The tropical dry forest (BTS) of Yucatan Peninsula has been managed for centuries, but the relationship between these management efforts and their effects on trees diversity has not been fully understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of forest management (thinning, harvesting and enrichment of species), in the structure of secondary vegetation derived from dry tropical forests, in two communities in Calakmul, Campeche, Southeast Mexico. We analyzed changes in the composition, species richness, species diversity, and structure in secondary vegetation subject to following types of management: (1) secondary vegetation with beekeeping management (MA), secondary vegetation with forest management (MF), natural secondary vegetation (SM) and tropical dry forest (BTS). The species composition was similar between secondary vegetation managed and unmanaged. On the other hand, between managed secondary vegetation and BTS there were differences in species composition. Species richness was not different between all conditions. MA showed the lowest species diversity and presented higher average density (5 413±770.26 ind.ha-1).MF had lowest average density (3 289 ± 1 183.60 ind.ha-1). BTS showed the highest average basal area (24.89 ± 1.56 m2.ha-1) regarding the other conditions. We concluded that is necessary to keep monitoring the managed areas to detect effects of management that may be adverse or favorable to conservation of floristic diversity of BTS. Inglés
Disponible en línea
Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior