Vista normal Vista MARC

Topological structure of plant-bee networks in four mexican environments

Ramírez Flores, Vania A [autora] | Villanueva Gutiérrez, Rogel, 1952-2019 [autor] | Roubik, David Ward, 1951- [autor] | Vergara Briceño, Carlos Hernán [autor] | Lara Rodríguez, Nubia [autora] | Dáttilo, Wesley [autor] | Ferrer, M. E. B [autor/a] | Rico Gray, Víctor [autor].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 en línea Artículo en línea Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Abejas | Relación insecto-planta | Polinización | VegetaciónTema(s) en inglés: Bees | Plant-insect relationships | Pollination | VegetationDescriptor(es) geográficos: La Mancha (Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave, México) | Totutla (Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave, México) | Felipe Carrillo Puerto (Quintana Roo, México) | Tehuacán (Puebla, México) | Cuicatlán, Chinantla (Puebla, México) Nota de acceso: Acceso en línea sin restricciones En: Sociobiology. Volumen 62, número 1 (March, 2015), páginas 56-64. --ISSN: 0361-6525Número de sistema: 6974Resumen:
Inglés

We analyzed the topological structure (e.g., links per species, connectance, core-periphery analyses, specialization, nestedness, modularity) of plant-bee interactions of four areas in Mexico. We used qualitative data (binary networks). Mexico exhibits a complex geography and community variation that can affect bee networks. Network architecture is variable within large spatial scales, thus our results should vary according to site characteristics (La Mancha and Totula in Veracruz, Carrillo Puerto in Quintana Roo, and the Tehuacan- Cuicatlan valley, in Puebla), type of vegetation, endemism, altitude, size of area sampled. Network topology varied among sites, and the presence of nested or modular patterns was analyzed for robustness to simulated species extinctions. The lowest species richness was recorded for the Quintana Roo site (15 plant, 25 bee species), and the highest for the Tehuacan-Cuicatlan valley site (88 plant, 231 bee species). There was a tendency to have more connected networks when species richness was low and networks with greater species richness had a higher number of interactions. The distribution of interactions differed between environments but not due to network size and all were significantly nested. The robustness to cumulative extinctions showed a different pattern at each site; the most robust network was at Carrillo Puerto, which also was the site with less species. Sites with more endemic species (e.g. Tehuacan) had more specialized interactions, and were more susceptible to extinction.

Recurso en línea: http://periodicos.uefs.br/ojs/index.php/sociobiology/article/view/753/661
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400069747739

Acceso en línea sin restricciones

We analyzed the topological structure (e.g., links per species, connectance, core-periphery analyses, specialization, nestedness, modularity) of plant-bee interactions of four areas in Mexico. We used qualitative data (binary networks). Mexico exhibits a complex geography and community variation that can affect bee networks. Network architecture is variable within large spatial scales, thus our results should vary according to site characteristics (La Mancha and Totula in Veracruz, Carrillo Puerto in Quintana Roo, and the Tehuacan- Cuicatlan valley, in Puebla), type of vegetation, endemism, altitude, size of area sampled. Network topology varied among sites, and the presence of nested or modular patterns was analyzed for robustness to simulated species extinctions. The lowest species richness was recorded for the Quintana Roo site (15 plant, 25 bee species), and the highest for the Tehuacan-Cuicatlan valley site (88 plant, 231 bee species). There was a tendency to have more connected networks when species richness was low and networks with greater species richness had a higher number of interactions. The distribution of interactions differed between environments but not due to network size and all were significantly nested. The robustness to cumulative extinctions showed a different pattern at each site; the most robust network was at Carrillo Puerto, which also was the site with less species. Sites with more endemic species (e.g. Tehuacan) had more specialized interactions, and were more susceptible to extinction. eng

Con tecnología Koha