Vista normal Vista MARC

Advances in the study of Mexican fisheries with the social-ecological system (SES) perspective and its inclusion in fishery management policy

Por: Peña Puch, Angelina del Carmen. Doctora [autora].
Pérez Jiménez, Juan Carlos [autor] | Espinoza Tenorio, Alejandro [autor].
Tipo de material: Artículo en línea Artículo en línea Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Administración de la industria pesquera | Pesca sostenible | Ecología social | Política pesqueraTema(s) en inglés: Fishery management | Sustainable fisheries | Social ecology | Fishery policyDescriptor(es) geográficos: México Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso En: Ocean & Coastal Management. Volumen 185, 105065 (March 2020), páginas 1-6. --ISSN: 0964-5691Número de sistema: 59879Resumen:
Inglés

This study describes the progress of the use of the SES perspective and/or the consideration of users' participation in the scientific literature that study Mexican fisheries, and their inclusion in the fishery management policy. Since 2001, there have been 57 published investigations on 19 fisheries, mostly from the north Pacific (n= 39), focussed mainly on the governance of SES of benthic fisheries, and from the southern Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea (n= 14), where co-management and the spiny lobster fishery are the most studied. From 21 fisheries having a fishery management plan (FMP), only seven have an international sustainability standard, while another seven fisheries having a sustainability standard have no FMP. In addition, only nine fisheries, with literature that addresses the SES perspective and/or considers the user's participation (out of a total of 19), have a FMP and only four of those fisheries have a sustainability standard. This reflects a mismatch between the interests of the academic, fishery, and government sectors. The SES perspective has been stable in the academic research since 2012, and has been implemented for some fisheries through participatory management processes of international fishery standards; however, this perspective needs to be fully included in Mexican fishery management instruments (e.g., FMPs) and its implementation could be a primary goal for Mexican fishery policy.

Recurso en línea: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105065
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE) 		ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400598794827

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

This study describes the progress of the use of the SES perspective and/or the consideration of users' participation in the scientific literature that study Mexican fisheries, and their inclusion in the fishery management policy. Since 2001, there have been 57 published investigations on 19 fisheries, mostly from the north Pacific (n= 39), focussed mainly on the governance of SES of benthic fisheries, and from the southern Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea (n= 14), where co-management and the spiny lobster fishery are the most studied. From 21 fisheries having a fishery management plan (FMP), only seven have an international sustainability standard, while another seven fisheries having a sustainability standard have no FMP. In addition, only nine fisheries, with literature that addresses the SES perspective and/or considers the user's participation (out of a total of 19), have a FMP and only four of those fisheries have a sustainability standard. This reflects a mismatch between the interests of the academic, fishery, and government sectors. The SES perspective has been stable in the academic research since 2012, and has been implemented for some fisheries through participatory management processes of international fishery standards; however, this perspective needs to be fully included in Mexican fishery management instruments (e.g., FMPs) and its implementation could be a primary goal for Mexican fishery policy. eng

Con tecnología Koha