Vista normal Vista MARC

Evaluating the sustainability of conservation and development strategies: the case of management units for wildlife conservation in Tabasco, Mexico

Pineda Vázquez, Mariana [autora] | Ortega Argueta, Alejandro [autor] | Mesa Jurado, María Azahara [autora] | Escalona Segura, Griselda [autora].
Tipo de material: Artículo en línea Artículo en línea Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Unidades de Manejo para la Conservación de la Vida Silvestre | Sustentabilidad | Política ambiental | Conservación de la diversidad biológicaTema(s) en inglés: Wildlife Conservation Management Units | Sustainability | Environmental policy | Biological diversity conservationDescriptor(es) geográficos: Tabasco (México) Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso En: Journal of Environmental Management. Volumen 248, art. número 109260 (October 2019), páginas 1-11. --ISSN: 0301-4797Número de sistema: 59453Resumen:
Inglés

Strategies that integrate conservation and development objectives are increasingly common, albeit still controversial, at the global scale. There are information gaps regarding their overall reach and sustainability through an integral assessment approach. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: 1) to design a Methodological Framework of Sustainability Evaluation (MFSE) that could be applied to the assessment ofconservation and development strategies; and 2) to apply this MFSE in an empirical exercise with management units for wildlife conservation (UMAs, by its Spanish acronym), a major environmental policy in Mexico. The UMAs confer legal rights to landowners for the exploitation of wildlife and protection of ecosystems. The MFSE had five hierarchical levels (three sustainability dimensions, general and specific criteria, indicators and metrics), which are grouped into a Sustainability Index (SI). Data was collected from official databases, structured interviews with official managers and landowners, andfield observations in six UMAs in Tabasco, Mexico. According to thefindings, the SI in the social dimension showed the highest values, followed by the environmental and economic dimensions. The key aspects for sustainability in the six UMAs are: 1) local governance norms, 2) active participation and interinstitutional linkage, 3) capacity for initial economic investment and long-term vision and 4) project liability and appropriation from their design. Free-ranging and intensive UMAs pose different objectives, since the former are focused on the management and conservation of ecosystems where the species of interest are found, while the latter are focused on species-based management, mostly those of economic interest. For this reason, they may require separate governmental appraisal as different management systems.

Recurso en línea: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109260
Lista(s) en las que aparece este ítem: Mujeres en la ciencia-ECOSUR Villahermosa | Diversidad biológica de Tabasco | Conservación-Campeche
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE) 		ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400594533650

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

Strategies that integrate conservation and development objectives are increasingly common, albeit still controversial, at the global scale. There are information gaps regarding their overall reach and sustainability through an integral assessment approach. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: 1) to design a Methodological Framework of Sustainability Evaluation (MFSE) that could be applied to the assessment ofconservation and development strategies; and 2) to apply this MFSE in an empirical exercise with management units for wildlife conservation (UMAs, by its Spanish acronym), a major environmental policy in Mexico. The UMAs confer legal rights to landowners for the exploitation of wildlife and protection of ecosystems. The MFSE had five hierarchical levels (three sustainability dimensions, general and specific criteria, indicators and metrics), which are grouped into a Sustainability Index (SI). Data was collected from official databases, structured interviews with official managers and landowners, andfield observations in six UMAs in Tabasco, Mexico. According to thefindings, the SI in the social dimension showed the highest values, followed by the environmental and economic dimensions. The key aspects for sustainability in the six UMAs are: 1) local governance norms, 2) active participation and interinstitutional linkage, 3) capacity for initial economic investment and long-term vision and 4) project liability and appropriation from their design. Free-ranging and intensive UMAs pose different objectives, since the former are focused on the management and conservation of ecosystems where the species of interest are found, while the latter are focused on species-based management, mostly those of economic interest. For this reason, they may require separate governmental appraisal as different management systems. eng

Con tecnología Koha