Vista normal Vista MARC

Evaluating the sustainability of conservation and development strategies : the case of management units for wildlife conservation in Tabasco, Mexico

Tipo de material: Artículo
 en línea Artículo en línea Idioma: Inglés Tipo de contenido:
  • Texto
Tipo de medio:
  • Computadora
Tipo de soporte:
  • Recurso en línea
Tema(s) en español: Tema(s) en inglés: Recurso en línea: En: Journal of Environmental Management Volumen 248, art. número 109260 (October 2019), páginas 1-11Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso Resumen:
Inglés

Strategies that integrate conservation and development objectives are increasingly common, albeit still controversial, at the global scale. There are information gaps regarding their overall reach and sustainability through an integral assessment approach. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: 1) to design a Methodological Framework of Sustainability Evaluation (MFSE) that could be applied to the assessment ofconservation and development strategies; and 2) to apply this MFSE in an empirical exercise with management units for wildlife conservation (UMAs, by its Spanish acronym), a major environmental policy in Mexico. The UMAs confer legal rights to landowners for the exploitation of wildlife and protection of ecosystems. The MFSE had five hierarchical levels (three sustainability dimensions, general and specific criteria, indicators and metrics), which are grouped into a Sustainability Index (SI). Data was collected from official databases, structured interviews with official managers and landowners, andfield observations in six UMAs in Tabasco, Mexico. According to thefindings, the SI in the social dimension showed the highest values, followed by the environmental and economic dimensions. The key aspects for sustainability in the six UMAs are: 1) local governance norms, 2) active participation and interinstitutional linkage, 3) capacity for initial economic investment and long-term vision and 4) project liability and appropriation from their design. Free-ranging and intensive UMAs pose different objectives, since the former are focused on the management and conservation of ecosystems where the species of interest are found, while the latter are focused on species-based management, mostly those of economic interest. For this reason, they may require separate governmental appraisal as different management systems.

Número de sistema: 59453
Lista(s) en las que aparece este ítem: Mujeres en la ciencia-ECOSUR Villahermosa | Diversidad biológica de Tabasco | Conservación-Campeche | Conservación de la biodiversidad 2015-2025
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Valoración
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Estado Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica Recursos en línea (RE) ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400594533650

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

Strategies that integrate conservation and development objectives are increasingly common, albeit still controversial, at the global scale. There are information gaps regarding their overall reach and sustainability through an integral assessment approach. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: 1) to design a Methodological Framework of Sustainability Evaluation (MFSE) that could be applied to the assessment ofconservation and development strategies; and 2) to apply this MFSE in an empirical exercise with management units for wildlife conservation (UMAs, by its Spanish acronym), a major environmental policy in Mexico. The UMAs confer legal rights to landowners for the exploitation of wildlife and protection of ecosystems. The MFSE had five hierarchical levels (three sustainability dimensions, general and specific criteria, indicators and metrics), which are grouped into a Sustainability Index (SI). Data was collected from official databases, structured interviews with official managers and landowners, andfield observations in six UMAs in Tabasco, Mexico. According to thefindings, the SI in the social dimension showed the highest values, followed by the environmental and economic dimensions. The key aspects for sustainability in the six UMAs are: 1) local governance norms, 2) active participation and interinstitutional linkage, 3) capacity for initial economic investment and long-term vision and 4) project liability and appropriation from their design. Free-ranging and intensive UMAs pose different objectives, since the former are focused on the management and conservation of ecosystems where the species of interest are found, while the latter are focused on species-based management, mostly those of economic interest. For this reason, they may require separate governmental appraisal as different management systems. Inglés