Vista normal Vista MARC

Is applied nucleation a straightforward, cost-effective forest restoration approach? Counter-response to Holl and Zahawi (2018)

Ramírez Soto, Aníbal [autor] | Lucio Palacio, César Raziel [autor] | Rodríguez Mesa, Rafael [autor] | Sheseña Hernández, Ixchel Minerva [autora] | Farhat, Fadi N [autor] | Villa Bonilla, Bernardino [autor] | Landa Libreros, Laura [autora] | Gutiérrez Sosa, Gabriela [autora] | Trujillo Santos, Omar [autor] | Gómez Sánchez, Israel [autor] | Ruelas Inzunza, Ernesto [autor].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 en línea Artículo en línea Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Restauración forestal | Costo de reforestación | Ciencias agropecuarias y biotecnología Ciencias agrarias Ciencia forestal -- ConservaciónTema(s) en inglés: Forest restoration | Reforestation costDescriptor(es) geográficos: México Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso En: Restoration Ecology. Volumen 26, número 4 (July 2018), páginas 620-621. --ISSN: 1526-100XNúmero de sistema: 59294Resumen:
Inglés

Holl and Zahawi (2018) agree on a number of approaches that we describe in a local case study of tropical montane cloud forest restoration in Mexico. However, they contend our argument that most applied nucleation projects have taken place in tropical lowlands as a mistake. They also provide data on the per‐hectare cost of restoration projects in Costa Rica and compare it to a higher cost figure of plantation‐style reforestation, a view contrary to ours. Last, Holl and Zahawi recognize that applied nucleation requires specialized personnel, but imply that the amount of training needed for this endeavor is not very different than what is required to implement other forest recovery projects. In this counter‐response, we provide some refinements to our original opinion and offer further information in support to our perspective.

Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400592944536

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

Holl and Zahawi (2018) agree on a number of approaches that we describe in a local case study of tropical montane cloud forest restoration in Mexico. However, they contend our argument that most applied nucleation projects have taken place in tropical lowlands as a mistake. They also provide data on the per‐hectare cost of restoration projects in Costa Rica and compare it to a higher cost figure of plantation‐style reforestation, a view contrary to ours. Last, Holl and Zahawi recognize that applied nucleation requires specialized personnel, but imply that the amount of training needed for this endeavor is not very different than what is required to implement other forest recovery projects. In this counter‐response, we provide some refinements to our original opinion and offer further information in support to our perspective. eng

Con tecnología Koha