Vista normal Vista MARC

Behavioral response of two species of stingless bees and the honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) to GF-120

Gómez Escobar, Enoc | Liedo Fernández, Pablo [autor] | Montoya Gerardo, Pablo Jesús [autor] | Vandame, Rémy [autor] | Sánchez Guillén, Daniel [autor].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 impreso(a) 
 
  y electrónico  
  Artículo impreso(a) y electrónico Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Abejas | Trigona fulviventris | Scaptotrigona mexicana | Abeja melífera | Espinosad | EcotoxicologíaTema(s) en inglés: Bees | Trigona fulviventris | Scaptotrigona mexicana | Honey bee | Spinosad | Environmental toxicologyNota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso En: Journal of Economic Entomology. volumen 107, número 4 (August 2014), páginas 1447-1449. --ISSN: 0022-0493Número de sistema: 53559Resumen:
Inglés

We present the results of evaluating the response of three species of bees, Trigona fulviventris (Guérin), Scaptotrigona mexicana (Guérin-Meneville), and Apis mellifera (L.), to food sources baited with the toxic bait GF-120 (NF Naturalyte), a spinosad-based bait exclusively used to manage fruit flies. Groups of foragers were trained to collect honey and water from a feeder located 50 m from the colonies. Once a sufficient number of foragers were observed at the experimental location, the training feeder was changed to two or three feeders that offered either honey and water, GF-120, Captor (hydrolyzed protein), GF-120 and honey (4:6), or Captor and honey (1:19). T. fulviventris and S. mexicana rarely visited GF-120, Captor, or their mixtures with honey, while ∼28.5 and 1.5% of A. mellifera foragers visited the GF-120 and honey and Captor and honey mixtures, respectively. Our results show that GF-120 clearly repels T. fulviventris and S. mexicana, whereas for A. mellifera, repellence is not as marked when GF-120 is combined with highly nutritious substances like honey.

Recurso en línea: http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1603/EC13490
Lista(s) en las que aparece este ítem: Bibliografía DEAMP
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Info Vol Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400535591082
Artículos Biblioteca Tapachula

Texto colocado en la configuración de la biblioteca Tapachula

Artículos Hemeroteca (AR HM)
ECOSUR SIBE-TAPACHULA 001 Disponible 591023C53588-10

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

We present the results of evaluating the response of three species of bees, Trigona fulviventris (Guérin), Scaptotrigona mexicana (Guérin-Meneville), and Apis mellifera (L.), to food sources baited with the toxic bait GF-120 (NF Naturalyte), a spinosad-based bait exclusively used to manage fruit flies. Groups of foragers were trained to collect honey and water from a feeder located 50 m from the colonies. Once a sufficient number of foragers were observed at the experimental location, the training feeder was changed to two or three feeders that offered either honey and water, GF-120, Captor (hydrolyzed protein), GF-120 and honey (4:6), or Captor and honey (1:19). T. fulviventris and S. mexicana rarely visited GF-120, Captor, or their mixtures with honey, while ∼28.5 and 1.5% of A. mellifera foragers visited the GF-120 and honey and Captor and honey mixtures, respectively. Our results show that GF-120 clearly repels T. fulviventris and S. mexicana, whereas for A. mellifera, repellence is not as marked when GF-120 is combined with highly nutritious substances like honey. eng

Con tecnología Koha