Peripheral matters: the emergence of legalized politics in local struggles over unauthorized immigration
Por: Provine, Doris Marie [autor/a].
Rojas Wiesner, Martha [autor/a] | Martínez Velasco, Reynaldo Germán [autor/a].
Tipo de material: Artículo en línea Tema(s): Política de migración | Política pública | Derechos humanosTema(s) en inglés: Migration policy | Public policy | Human rightsDescriptor(es) geográficos: Chiapas (México) | Arizona (Estados Unidos) Nota de acceso: Acceso en línea sin restricciones En: Law & Social Inquiry. volumen 39, número 3 (Summer 2014), páginas 601-620. --ISSN: 1747-4469Número de sistema: 53502Resumen:Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Colección | Signatura | Estado | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | Biblioteca Electrónica Recursos en línea (RE) | ECOSUR | Recurso digital | ECO40053502470 |
Acceso en línea sin restricciones
National immigration policy meets the realities of unauthorized immigration at the local level, often in ways undesired by residents, as exemplified by the dramatic rise of local anti-immigrant legislation in US states and municipalities. Scholars have studied why some states and municipalities, but not others, engage in immigration policy making. Such research is not designed, however, to evaluate how the basic structure of US government facilitates and shapes local protest. To probe that issue, we compare Chiapas, Mexico and Arizona, USA, both peripheral areas significantly affected by unauthorized immigration and national policies designed to control it. We find that the open texture of US federalism facilitates local activism, while Mexico's more centralized government does not. Activists within both states are similar, however, in deploying law creatively to critique national policy, a reminder of the growing worldwide significance of legal pluralism and legal consciousness in the politics of protest. eng
Disponible en línea
Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior