Vista normal Vista MARC

Semiochemical interactions between Scolytus ventralis LeConte and Pityokteines elegans (Swaine) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)

Por: Macías Sámano, J. E.. Doctor [autor].
Borden, John H [autor].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 impreso(a) 
 
  y electrónico  
  Artículo impreso(a) y electrónico Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Scolytus ventralis | Pityokteines elegans | Thanasimus undatulus | Enocleros sphegeus | Escarabajos | Semioquímicos | Feromonas de insectos | Control de insectos | EscarabajosTema(s) en inglés: Scolytus ventralis | Pityokteines elegans | Thanasimus undatulus | Enoclerus sphegeus | Beetles | Semiochemicals | Insect pheromones | Insect control | BeetlesClasificación: AR/595.768 / M5 Nota de acceso: Acceso en línea sin restricciones En: Journal of Entomological Science. Volumen 36, número 3 (July 2001), páginas 251-258. --ISSN: 0749-8004Número de sistema: 52226Resumen:
Inglés

Two experiments evaluated the effect of baiting uninfested grand fir logs and trees undergoing initial attack by Scolytus ventralis LeConte with Pityokteines elegans (Swaine) pheromone, on the subsequent attack by both species. Two more experiments assessed the effect of synthetic bark oil, exo-brevicomin, and P. elegans pheromone on the response by each species to multiple-funnel traps baited with attractants for the other species. The pheromone of P. elegans on unattacked logs did not have an inhibitory effect on the attack by S. ventralis. However, trees attacked by S. ventralis that were baited with P. elegans pheromone just after attack, yielded significantly fewer S. ventralis progeny than the unbaited controls. Neither synthetic bark oil nor exo-brevicomin caused a significant change in the catch of P. elegans in traps baited with its pheromone, but the predator Thanasimus undatulus Say was caught in traps baited with ([plus or minus])-ipsenol, ([plus or minus])-ipsdienol and synthetic bark oil, and another predator, Enoclerus sphegeus F., was caught in traps baited with exo-brevicomin alone or in combination with ipsenol and ipsdienol. The results do not support the hypothesis that interference competition based on semiochemical communication occurs between the two species.

Recurso en línea: http://dx.doi.org/10.18474/0749-8004-36.3.251
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Info Vol Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO4000005226
Artículos Biblioteca San Cristóbal

Texto en la configuración de la biblioteca San Cristóbal

Artículos (AR)
ECOSUR AR 595.768 M5 001 Disponible ECO010018899

Acceso en línea sin restricciones

Two experiments evaluated the effect of baiting uninfested grand fir logs and trees undergoing initial attack by Scolytus ventralis LeConte with Pityokteines elegans (Swaine) pheromone, on the subsequent attack by both species. Two more experiments assessed the effect of synthetic bark oil, exo-brevicomin, and P. elegans pheromone on the response by each species to multiple-funnel traps baited with attractants for the other species. The pheromone of P. elegans on unattacked logs did not have an inhibitory effect on the attack by S. ventralis. However, trees attacked by S. ventralis that were baited with P. elegans pheromone just after attack, yielded significantly fewer S. ventralis progeny than the unbaited controls. Neither synthetic bark oil nor exo-brevicomin caused a significant change in the catch of P. elegans in traps baited with its pheromone, but the predator Thanasimus undatulus Say was caught in traps baited with ([plus or minus])-ipsenol, ([plus or minus])-ipsdienol and synthetic bark oil, and another predator, Enoclerus sphegeus F., was caught in traps baited with exo-brevicomin alone or in combination with ipsenol and ipsdienol. The results do not support the hypothesis that interference competition based on semiochemical communication occurs between the two species. eng

Con tecnología Koha