Can species distribution modelling provide estimates of population densities?: a case study with jaguars in the neotropics
Tôrres, Natália M [autora] | De Marco Júnior, Paulo [autor] | Santos, Thiago [autor] | Silveira, Leandro [autor].
Tipo de material: Artículo impreso(a) Tema(s): Jaguares | Zoogeografía | Sistemas de información geográficaDescriptor(es) geográficos: Yucatán (Península) (México) En: Diversity and Distribution. volumen 18, número 5-6 (May-June 2012), páginas 615-627. --ISSN: 1366-9516Número de sistema: 51865Resumen:Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Colección | Signatura | Info Vol | Estado | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos |
Biblioteca Chetumal
Texto en configuración de biblioteca Chetumal |
FROSUR | 001 | Disponible | 650531C51865-10 |
Aim To test the prediction that environmental suitability derived from species distribution modelling (SDM) could be a surrogate for jaguar local population density estimates. Location Americas. Methods We used 1409 occurrence records of jaguars to model the distribution of the species using 11 SDM methods. We tested whether models' suitability is linearly correlated with jaguar population densities estimated from 37 different locations. We evaluated whether the relationship between density and suitability forms a constraint envelope, in which higher densities are found mainly in regions with high suitability, whereas low densities can occur in regions with variable suitability. We tested this using heteroscedasticity test and quantile regressions. Results A positive linear relationship between suitability and jaguar density was found only for four methods [bioclimatic envelope (BIOCLIM), genetic algorithm for rule set production (GARP), maximum entropy (Maxent) and generalized boosting models (GBM)], but with weak explanatory power. BIOCLIM showed the strongest relationship. eng
Variance of suitability for lower densities values was larger than for higher values for many of the SDM models used, but the quantile regression was significantly positive only for BIOCLIM and random forests (RF). RF and GBM provided the most accurate models when measured with the standard SDM evaluation metrics, but possess poor relationship with local density estimates. Main conclusions Results indicate that the relationship between density and suitability could be better described as a triangular constraint envelope than by a straight positive relationship, and some of the SDM methods tested here were able to discriminate regions with high or low local population densities. Low jaguar densities can occur in areas with low or high suitability, whereas high values are restricted to areas where the suitability is greater. In high suitability areas but with low jaguar density estimates, we discuss how extrinsic factors driving abundance could act at local scales and then prevent higher densities that would be expected by the favourable regional environmental conditions. eng