Vista normal Vista MARC

Number of honeybee colonies in areas with high and low beekeeping activity in Southern Mexico

Moritz, Robin F. A [autor] | Bernhard Kraus, F [autor] | Huth Schwarz, Anett [autora] | Wolf, Stephan [autor/a] | Castillo Carrillo, Claudia A [autora] | Paxton, Robert J [autor] | Vandame, Rémy [autor].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 impreso(a) 
 Artículo impreso(a) Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Abeja melífera | Población animal | ApiculturaTema(s) en inglés: Honey bee | Animal populations | ApicultureDescriptor(es) geográficos: Chiapas (México) | Yucatán (México) Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso En: Apidologie. volumen 44, número 1, (January 2013), páginas 113-120. --ISSN: 0044-8435Número de sistema: 51443Resumen:
Inglés

The number of colonies in feral and managed honeybee populations (Apis mellifera) was determined for various sampling locations in Chiapas and Yucatan (Mexico) to assess the impact of apiculture on feral honeybee populations. We used a comparative sampling approach determining the number of colonies in similar habitats and landscapes but with different intensity of beekeeping. Sampling sites included nature reserves, and mango and shaded coffee plantations. The agricultural sites were all set in high-diversity landscapes with plenty of surrounding secondary forest. The number of colonies was determined by genotyping drones caught on drone congregation areas and assigning the drone genotypes to mother queens each heading a colony. We used three sets of linked markers each to achieve sufficient resolution for a precise colony assignment. The estimated colony numbers ranged from 34 to 54 colonies, with an average of 38.3 ± 6.9 colonies in areas with high and 43.5 ± 6.6 colonies in areas with low beekeeping activity. There was no significant difference in colony numbers between the sites with high and low beekeeping activity suggesting that the managed honeybee populations do not substantially add to the overall number of honeybee colonies supported in the wild. This might indicate that restrictions on apicultural activities to prevent any potential conservation conflict with native pollinators might not be useful, since honeybee colonies are very abundant in many different landscapes in Southern Mexico independent of apiculture.

Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Info Vol Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400514439792
Artículos Biblioteca Tapachula

Texto colocado en la configuración de la biblioteca Tapachula

Artículos Hemeroteca (AR HM)
ECOSUR 001 Disponible 430606C51504-10

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

The number of colonies in feral and managed honeybee populations (Apis mellifera) was determined for various sampling locations in Chiapas and Yucatan (Mexico) to assess the impact of apiculture on feral honeybee populations. We used a comparative sampling approach determining the number of colonies in similar habitats and landscapes but with different intensity of beekeeping. Sampling sites included nature reserves, and mango and shaded coffee plantations. The agricultural sites were all set in high-diversity landscapes with plenty of surrounding secondary forest. The number of colonies was determined by genotyping drones caught on drone congregation areas and assigning the drone genotypes to mother queens each heading a colony. We used three sets of linked markers each to achieve sufficient resolution for a precise colony assignment. The estimated colony numbers ranged from 34 to 54 colonies, with an average of 38.3 ± 6.9 colonies in areas with high and 43.5 ± 6.6 colonies in areas with low beekeeping activity. There was no significant difference in colony numbers between the sites with high and low beekeeping activity suggesting that the managed honeybee populations do not substantially add to the overall number of honeybee colonies supported in the wild. This might indicate that restrictions on apicultural activities to prevent any potential conservation conflict with native pollinators might not be useful, since honeybee colonies are very abundant in many different landscapes in Southern Mexico independent of apiculture. eng

Con tecnología Koha