Vista normal Vista MARC

Forest landscape restoration in the drylands of Latin America

Newton, Adrian C | Del Castillo Sánchez, Rafael Felipe [autor/a] | Echeverría, Cristian [autor/a] | Geneletti, Davide [autor/a] | González Espinosa, Mario, 1950- [autor/a] | Malizia, Lucio Ricardo [autor/a] | Premoli, Malizia [autor/a] | Rey Benayas, José María [autor/a] | Smith Ramírez, Cecilia [autor/a] | Williams Linera, Guadalupe [autor/a].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 en línea Artículo en línea Tipo de contenido: texto Tipo de medio: computadora Tipo de portador: recurso en líneaTema(s): Restauración del paisaje forestal | Árboles nativos | Paisajes fragmentados | Factores socioeconómicos | Servicios ecosistémicosTema(s) en inglés: Forest landscape restoration | Natives trees | Fragmented landscapes | Socioeconomic factors | Ecosystem servicesDescriptor(es) geográficos: Paso de Ovejas (Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave, México) | Región Mixteca (Oaxaca, México) | Chiapas (México) | Chile | Argentina Nota de acceso: Acceso en línea sin restricciones En: Ecology and Society. Volumen 17, número 1 (2012). --ISSN: 1708-3087Número de sistema: 50296Resumen:
Inglés

Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR) involves the ecological restoration of degraded forest landscapes, with the aim of benefiting both biodiversity and human well-being. We first identify four fundamental principles of FLR, based on previous definitions. We then critically evaluate the application of these principles in practice, based on the experience gained during an international, collaborative research project conducted in six dry forest landscapes of Latin America. Research highlighted the potential for FLR; tree species of high socioeconomic value were identified in all study areas, and strong dependence of local communities on forest resources was widely encountered, particularly for fuelwood. We demonstrated that FLR can be achieved through both passive and active restoration approaches, and can be cost-effective if the increased provision of ecosystem services is taken into account. These results therefore highlight the potential for FLR, and the positive contribution that it could make to sustainable development. However, we also encountered a number of challenges to FLR implementation, including the difficulty of achieving strong engagement in FLR activities among local stakeholders, lack of capacity for community-led initiatives, and the lack of an appropriate institutional and regulatory environment to support restoration activities. Successful implementation of FLR will require new collaborative alliances among stakeholders, empowerment and capacity building of local communities to enable them to fully engage with restoration activities, and an enabling public policy context to enable local people to be active participants in the decision making process.

Recurso en línea: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04572-170121 | https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/76240
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400502966170

Acceso en línea sin restricciones

Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR) involves the ecological restoration of degraded forest landscapes, with the aim of benefiting both biodiversity and human well-being. We first identify four fundamental principles of FLR, based on previous definitions. We then critically evaluate the application of these principles in practice, based on the experience gained during an international, collaborative research project conducted in six dry forest landscapes of Latin America. Research highlighted the potential for FLR; tree species of high socioeconomic value were identified in all study areas, and strong dependence of local communities on forest resources was widely encountered, particularly for fuelwood. We demonstrated that FLR can be achieved through both passive and active restoration approaches, and can be cost-effective if the increased provision of ecosystem services is taken into account. These results therefore highlight the potential for FLR, and the positive contribution that it could make to sustainable development. However, we also encountered a number of challenges to FLR implementation, including the difficulty of achieving strong engagement in FLR activities among local stakeholders, lack of capacity for community-led initiatives, and the lack of an appropriate institutional and regulatory environment to support restoration activities. Successful implementation of FLR will require new collaborative alliances among stakeholders, empowerment and capacity building of local communities to enable them to fully engage with restoration activities, and an enabling public policy context to enable local people to be active participants in the decision making process. eng

Con tecnología Koha