Vista normal Vista MARC

Application of the Climafor baseline to determine leakage : the case of Scolel Té

Tipo de material: Artículo
 impreso(a) 
 
  y electrónico  
  Artículo impreso(a) y electrónico Idioma: Inglés Tema(s) en español: Clasificación:
  • AR/333.75137 D45
Recurso en línea: Formatos físicos adicionales disponibles:
  • Disponible en línea
En: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change volumen 12, número 6 (July 2007), páginas 1153-1168Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso Resumen:
Inglés

The acceptance of forestry-based project activities to mitigate greenhouse gases emissions has been subjected to a number of methodological questions to be answered, of which the most challenging are baseline establishment and identification of and measuring leakage. Here we pose hypotheses for and quantify leakage of the Scolel Te´ project in Chiapas, Mexico. In this project small-scale farmers are implementing forestry, agroforestry, and forest conservation activities, with carbon sequestration as one of the goals. The main leakage monitoring domain is defined as the area owned by the participating farmers or communities outside the area where the specific project activities take place. The null-hypothesis (no leakage) is that non-project land owned by the farmer or community will experience the same carbon stock changes as predicted by the regional baseline, specifically developed for the project. First we assessed the most likely causes and sources of leakage that may occur in the project. From this analysis, one type of leakage seems to be important, i.e., activity shifting. Second we estimated the leakage of a sample of participating farmers and communities. Actual land use was then compared with expected land use derived from the baseline. The Plan Vivo of each participant, complemented with readily available tools to identify the main sources and drivers of leakage are used to develop simple leakage assessment procedures, as demonstrated in this paper. Negative leakage was estimated to be negligible in this study. Incorporating these procedures already in the project planning stage will reduce the uncertainties related to the actual carbon mitigation potential of any forestry project.

Número de sistema: 44168
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Valoración
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura topográfica Info Vol Estado Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Campeche Artículos (AR) ECOSUR AR 333.75137 D45 004 Disponible ECO040003767
Artículos Biblioteca Chetumal Artículos (AR) ECOSUR AR 333.75137 D45 001 Disponible ECO030004799
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica Recursos en línea (RE) ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400441684415
Artículos Biblioteca San Cristóbal Artículos (AR) ECOSUR AR 333.75137 D45 002 Disponible ECO010010809
Artículos Biblioteca Tapachula Artículos (AR) ECOSUR AR 333.75137 D45 003 Disponible ECO020012077
Artículos Biblioteca Villahermosa Artículos (AR) ECOSUR AR 333.75137 D45 005 Disponible ECO050003767

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

The acceptance of forestry-based project activities to mitigate greenhouse gases emissions has been subjected to a number of methodological questions to be answered, of which the most challenging are baseline establishment and identification of and measuring leakage. Here we pose hypotheses for and quantify leakage of the Scolel Te´ project in Chiapas, Mexico. In this project small-scale farmers are implementing forestry, agroforestry, and forest conservation activities, with carbon sequestration as one of the goals. The main leakage monitoring domain is defined as the area owned by the participating farmers or communities outside the area where the specific project activities take place. The null-hypothesis (no leakage) is that non-project land owned by the farmer or community will experience the same carbon stock changes as predicted by the regional baseline, specifically developed for the project. First we assessed the most likely causes and sources of leakage that may occur in the project. From this analysis, one type of leakage seems to be important, i.e., activity shifting. Second we estimated the leakage of a sample of participating farmers and communities. Actual land use was then compared with expected land use derived from the baseline. The Plan Vivo of each participant, complemented with readily available tools to identify the main sources and drivers of leakage are used to develop simple leakage assessment procedures, as demonstrated in this paper. Negative leakage was estimated to be negligible in this study. Incorporating these procedures already in the project planning stage will reduce the uncertainties related to the actual carbon mitigation potential of any forestry project. Inglés

Disponible en línea

Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior