Vista normal Vista MARC

Foraging allocation in the honey bee, apismellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae), tuned by the presence of the spinosad-based pesticide GF-120

Tipo de material: Artículo
 en línea Artículo en línea Idioma: Inglés Tema(s) en español: Recurso en línea: Formatos físicos adicionales disponibles:
  • Disponible en línea
En: Neotropical Entomology volumen 44, número 2 (April 2015), páginas 166-172Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso Resumen:
Inglés

Agroecosystem management commonly involves the use of pesticides. As a result, a heterogeneous landscape is created, in which suitable and unsuitable spaces are defined by the absence/presence of pesticides. In this study, we explored how foragers of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L., adapt to such context. We specifically evaluated the effect of GF-120, a spinosad-based fruit fly toxic bait, on the allocation of foragers between food sources under the hypothesis that foragers will move from food sources with GF-120 to food sources without it. We thus carried out three experiments: in experiment 1, a group of foragers was trained to collect honey solution from a feeder; next, this feeder offered a GF-120/honey solution. A minority of foragers continued collecting the GF-120/honey solution. In experiment 2, we trained two groups of foragers from a colony to two food sources equally rewarding. Next, GF-120 was added to one of the food sources. We found that the majority of foragers moved from the GF-120-treated feeder to the feeder without GF-120 and that the minority that continued visiting the GF-120-treated feeder did not collect the GF- 120/honey solution. In a third experiment, we wanted to know if foragers in an experimental setup as in experiment 1 would performwaggle dances: none of the foragers that collected GF-120/honey were observed dancing. Our results emphasize the importance of "food refuges" for non-target species, since they minimize the impact of agrochemicals upon them.

Número de sistema: 34636
Lista(s) en las que aparece este ítem: Bibliografía DEAMP
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Valoración
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Estado Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica Recursos en línea (RE) ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400346363500

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

Agroecosystem management commonly involves the use of pesticides. As a result, a heterogeneous landscape is created, in which suitable and unsuitable spaces are defined by the absence/presence of pesticides. In this study, we explored how foragers of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L., adapt to such context. We specifically evaluated the effect of GF-120, a spinosad-based fruit fly toxic bait, on the allocation of foragers between food sources under the hypothesis that foragers will move from food sources with GF-120 to food sources without it. We thus carried out three experiments: in experiment 1, a group of foragers was trained to collect honey solution from a feeder; next, this feeder offered a GF-120/honey solution. A minority of foragers continued collecting the GF-120/honey solution. In experiment 2, we trained two groups of foragers from a colony to two food sources equally rewarding. Next, GF-120 was added to one of the food sources. We found that the majority of foragers moved from the GF-120-treated feeder to the feeder without GF-120 and that the minority that continued visiting the GF-120-treated feeder did not collect the GF- 120/honey solution. In a third experiment, we wanted to know if foragers in an experimental setup as in experiment 1 would performwaggle dances: none of the foragers that collected GF-120/honey were observed dancing. Our results emphasize the importance of "food refuges" for non-target species, since they minimize the impact of agrochemicals upon them. Inglés

Disponible en línea

Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior